Quick academic help
Don't let the stress of school get you down! Have your essay written by a professional writer before the deadline arrives.
Plato The Apology Free Essays - Free Essay Examples …
Hi Liz, I have written a response to this question without reading the model essay. Could you please tell me which band I am likely to secure? And any suggestions please?
Completion of higher education is considered as a vital step for one’s professional progression. Anyhow, getting skilled and experienced in various fields is also detrimental for professional grooming and economic independence. In my opinion, some practical skills must be attained by students during their educational journey but they must complete their university education first in order to get ensured economic stability later on and shouldn’t be relying wholly upon soft skills. These additional skills must be seen as a top up in their career building.
Hi Liz. I have a question if you have time. In discussion essay if I do not agree with the statement how can I write it? For exampla, continuous coverage of sport discourages the young from taking part in any sport. i mean thesis and body paragraph. I wrote introduction. Please help me. I have a month left to the exam. Thank you very much
Socrates apology essay - Write My Term Paper For Me
Hi Liz! Thank you for all the good advice you share with us. Specially, these essay models, which are great study material for students like me preparing to take the exam.
After doing your advanced lessons, I came across the following essay question: “Some people feel crime rates are best lowered by increasing prison sentences”. Discuss this topic. What are some alternatives to raising prison sentences?
In this case, it is not clear to me whether I have to give my opinion or not. Also, I think I have to discuss both sides, even though they only introduce one, is that right? What is the correct approach to write an introduction and conclusion for this essay?
I’d be greatful if you can help me with these doubts.
Hi Liz! Your study material is amazing and is helping me a lot to prepare for IELTs. I have a few questions. In the Discussion Essay type (as the one you have posted above), do we need to always write a separate paragraph for our opinion (e.g. body: Finally, in my opinion…)? If my opinion concurs with one of the two sides, then can I just have two body paragraphs ( A and B side ) because I stated in my thesis that I concurred with one of them?
Also, I was wondering if we are allowed to use any white-out to erase pen during the exam and if we are given some additional papers to write the layout for the organization of our essays.
Thank you so much you’re such a great teacher!!!!!
Essay for kids on apology prohibition macbeth
HUNTSVILLE - The state of Texas defied an international court and executed Jose Ernesto Medellin late Tuesday after the U.S. Supreme Court denied a stay of execution for the killer in the 1993 Houston gang rape-murders of two teenage girls. Medellin, 33, was pronounced dead by lethal injection at 9:57 p.m., nine minutes after receiving the fatal cocktail and nearly four hours after his scheduled 6 p.m. execution. In his final statement, Medellin apologized for his crime: "I'm sorry that my actions brought you pain. I hope this brings the closure to what you seek," he said. "Don't ever hate them for what they do. Never harbor hate." He then looked toward the witness room in which his friend, Sandra Crisp, was watching, crying softly, and smiled. "I love you," he said. In the adjoining witness room, relatives of the two victims watched with little apparent emotion.
Medellin, a Mexican national who spent most of his life in the United States, was condemned for the June 1993 murders of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Peña, 16. The girls were raped and strangled with a belt and shoelace after they stumbled into a drunken gang initiation rite while cutting through the park to get home before their curfew. Four days after the crime, a tip from a gang member's brother led authorities to the bodies, then to the suspects. Within three hours of his arrest, Medellin admitted his role in the gruesome murders, appalling authorities with his boastful, callous description of the night's events.
At issue in Medellin's last-minute appeal was his assertion that authorities refused his right to contact the Mexican Consulate after his arrest. By doing so, his attorneys argued, officials violated a 1963 treaty signed by the U.S. and 165 other countries that should have granted him access. His case stirred international controversy when the United Nations' high court found his rights had been violated. The court ordered the execution be stayed.
While some cheered Texas' decision to execute him on Tuesday, others warned that his death could render the treaty void, putting the lives of American citizens arrested overseas in jeopardy. The fathers of the victims, however, expressed relief. "It's a long time coming," Adolfo Peña said, "Fifteen years is a long time. I wish those two girls could've lived that long." Randy Ertman stood with his arm around Christina Alamaraz, a close friend. He said recent media attention had been too focused on Medellin and not their daughters.
Sandra Babcock, a law professor at Northwestern University in Chicago and an attorney for Medellin, said the case was not just about one Mexican national on death row. "It's also about ordinary Americans who count on the protections of the consulate when they travel abroad in strange lands," she said. "It's about the reputation of the U.S. as a nation that adheres to the rule of law."
In the discussion essay, the main idea of the body paragraph 1 is already given in the statement,which is “other people think that something is good”
and we can then, depending on the topic, put many supporting ideas under this, like ( it benefits society, it benefits the individual, economic growth.. )
And that would not be against the rule of having one central main idea in each body paragraph.
Why choose our assistance?
As soon as we have completed your work, it will be proofread and given a thorough scan for plagiarism.
Our clients' personal information is kept confidential, so rest assured that no one will find out about our cooperation.
We write everything from scratch. You'll be sure to receive a plagiarism-free paper every time you place an order.
We will complete your paper on time, giving you total peace of mind with every assignment you entrust us with.
Want something changed in your paper? Request as many revisions as you want until you're completely satisfied with the outcome.
We're always here to help you solve any possible issue. Feel free to give us a call or write a message in chat.
Yamaha Club BRASIL • View topic - socrates essay apology
I was wondering what should be the thesis statement of a discussion essay which doesn’t require opinion? Should it be like : in this essay both advantages and disadvantages of … Will be discussed? Or should one main advantage and disadvantage be discribed like this: for example : a public transport system has the main advantage of reducing traffic congestion in cities but it also has some disadvantages for example everyone is forced to pay for it but not everyone gets access to it.
Apology essay for behavior - term paper, …
The following essay will analyze three quotes from Apology and Crito, find the correlation between them, and reveal any flaws that may exsist inside these arguments made by Socrates.
Jason apology essay for behavior papers consultant you
HIGH COURT RULES BUSH ERRED IN HOUSTON CASE / President can't force a new trial for Mexican in 1993 murders, the justices find
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Texas cannot be forced by President Bush to reopen the case of Jose Medellin, a Mexican citizen sentenced to death for raping and murdering two teenage girls in Houston. By a 6-3 vote, the court said that a memo by Bush instructing the state to comply with a world court decision for a new hearing in the 1993 case was not sufficient to require the state to act. The dissenters, however, expressed concerns that the ruling would harm the United States' relationship with Mexico and make it more difficult to enforce international treaties.
Tuesday's decision will not immediately lead to an execution date for Medellin, who has exhausted all appeals and confessed to the killings of Jennifer Ertman, 14, and Elizabeth Pena, 16, after they happened upon a gang initiation. Harris County Assistant District Attorney Roe Wilson said the next step must wait until the justices resolve another case regarding the legality of lethal injections. All executions are on hold until that ruling is handed down. Mark Vinson, a former Harris County assistant district attorney who prosecuted Medellin, said, "I've been waiting for this decision for a long time. It looks like the court saw through this masquerade and rendered the proper ruling."
Donald Donovan, Medellin's attorney, said he was disappointed in the decision, which he called "a departure from the original intent of the framers of the Constitution and over 200 years of enforcement of U.S. treaties by U.S. courts." At issue was a 2004 ruling by the world court - formally known as the International Court of Justice - that the United States violated the rights of Medellin and 50 other citizens of Mexico as spelled out in the 1963 Vienna Convention. Mexico, which opposes the death penalty, brought suit in the court at The Hague, arguing that the U.S. violated the treaty by not allowing the defendants to notify a Mexican Consulate of their arrests.
The Mexican foreign ministry criticized the Supreme Court's ruling, complaining that the world court's decision "should be respected by those governments that have accepted its jurisdiction." Mexico "will continue making use of each and every one of the resources at its disposal to achieve the full respect for the rights" of its citizens, the foreign ministry said.
Even though Bush presided over 152 executions as governor of Texas, he sided with the world court and issued a memo in 2005 without consulting Congress. The memo directed state courts to comply with the decision to rehear the cases. But the Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed with Texas that Bush had overstepped his bounds. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said the president cannot unilaterally carry out an international treaty without concurrence of the Legislative Branch. "The responsibility for transforming an international obligation arising from a non-self-executing treaty into domestic law falls to Congress," Roberts wrote. In a dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer wrote that it would be impractical to involve Congress in carrying out numerous international agreements. He added that the ruling could lead to "worsening relations with our neighbor Mexico, of precipitating actions by other nations putting at risk American citizens who have the misfortune to be arrested while traveling abroad, or of diminishing our nation's reputation abroad as a result of our failure to follow the rule of law principles we preach." Breyer was joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsberg and David Souter in the dissent. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote a separate opinion concurring with Roberts' but nevertheless urged Texas to hold another hearing. An unusual coalition of liberal academics and conservative politicians had opposed the Bush administration's effort to force states to abide by the world court decision.
A spokeswoman for Texas Republican Gov. Rick Perry, who has been a close ally of Bush, welcomed the decision. "What the Supreme Court's decision did was affirm what the governor has always believed," said spokeswoman Krista Piferrer, "that the state has rights and that a court based in some foreign country has no jurisdiction in Texas."
Oval Office 'disappointed'
Ernest Young, a former University of Texas law professor, had filed a friend-of-the-court brief along with other professors, a number of them liberal, on behalf of the state of Texas. "This was a very broad claim to executive power," Young said of the administration's arguments. Young, now at Duke University, said he was surprised that the majority decision was written by Roberts, who in his confirmation hearing had expressed an expansive view of the powers of the president. White House spokeswoman Dana Perino dismissed suggestion that the decision was a blow to the president's powers, saying it applied only to this one issue. "But of course, since we urged a different result, we're disappointed with the decision," she said. "But we're going to accept it, and we're going to be reviewing it in regards to the impacts that it may have."
How it works
You submit your order instructions
We assign an appropriate expert
The expert takes care of your task
We send it to you upon completion
Average quality score
"I have always been impressed by the quick turnaround and your thoroughness. Easily the most professional essay writing service on the web."
"Your assistance and the first class service is much appreciated. My essay reads so well and without your help I'm sure I would have been marked down again on grammar and syntax."
"Thanks again for your excellent work with my assignments. No doubts you're true experts at what you do and very approachable."
"Very professional, cheap and friendly service. Thanks for writing two important essays for me, I wouldn't have written it myself because of the tight deadline."
"Thanks for your cautious eye, attention to detail and overall superb service. Thanks to you, now I am confident that I can submit my term paper on time."
"Thank you for the GREAT work you have done. Just wanted to tell that I'm very happy with my essay and will get back with more assignments soon."